DynaMed Weekly Update
March 31, 2009 Volume 4 Issue 13  
DynaMed Systematic Literature Surveillance


For the week ending March 27, 2009

 

This week, 325 articles were considered for inclusion in DynaMed and 94 met criteria for inclusion.

 

Based on the criteria of selecting “articles most likely to change clinical practice,” one article of significant interest is included in this weekly update.


Intensive Glucose Control May Increase Hypoglycemia with Unclear Mortality Benefit in Critically ill Patients


Intensive glucose control has been suggested for critically ill patients to improve outcomes. Two recent reports, a systematic review and a new randomized trial, found this treatment was associated with increased hypoglycemia and unclear benefits on mortality. A review of 26 randomized trials compared intensive glucose control with conventional glucose management in 13,567 intensive care unit (ICU) patients. There were no significant differences in overall mortality (24.7% vs. 24.9%). Intensive glucose control was associated with lower mortality in surgical ICU patients (7.4% vs. 11.8%, p < 0.05, NNT 23) in a meta-analysis of 5 trials (level 2 [mid-level] evidence). However, there was no difference in mortality in medical ICU patients (34.9% vs. 36.7%) or mortality in mixed ICU patients (26.7% vs. 25.6%).  Hypoglycemia was significantly increased in intensive glucose control groups (10.7% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.05, NNH 10).  The prevalence of diabetes was not reported (CMAJ 2009 Apr 14;180(8):821 PDF).  In the NICE-SUGAR trial, 6,104 patients (20% with history of diabetes) were randomized within 24 hours of ICU admission to intensive or conventional glucose control.  In this trial, intensive control was associated with both higher mortality (27.5% vs. 24.9%, p = 0.02, NNH 38) and a higher rate of severe hypoglycemia (6.8% vs. 0.5% (p < 0.001, NNH 15) (level 2 [mid-level] evidence).  In a subgroup analysis, surgical patients had higher mortality with intensive control (odds ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.07-1.61) (N Engl J Med 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1283).  For more information, see the new Intensive glucose control in critical care topic in DynaMed.


DynaMed Topic Activity

New summaries added this week:

 

·        Depression - differential diagnosis

·        Early revascularization for patients with acute myocardial infarction

·        Intensive glucose control in critical care

·        Mania - differential diagnosis

·        Psychosis - differential diagnosis


DynaMed Peer Review

We are currently seeking reviewers for:

 

·        Depression - differential diagnosis

·        Early revascularization for patients with acute myocardial infarction

·        Intensive glucose control in critical care

·        Mania - differential diagnosis

·        Psychosis - differential diagnosis

 

For more information, see Editorial Policies for Authors & Reviewers and DynaMed Peer Review.

DynaMed Weekly Update Podcast and RSS Feed Information
Share Update with a Colleague
DynaMed Weekly Update Archives
Subscribe FREE to DynaMed Weekly Update
To receive sign-up instructions, email us at DynaMedWU@ebscohost.com
with Subscribe in the subject line.

DynaMed Weekly Update is a compilation of 1 to 5 articles that are of significant interest to clinicians.  Articles are selected from DynaMed's Systematic Literature Surveillance as articles most likely to change clinical practice. Updates are prepared by the DynaMed Editorial Team which includes 28 clinicians from multiple disciplines. Send comments to DynaMedEditor@epnet.com. To learn more about DynaMed, go to www.dynamicmedical.com.

Published by DynaMed
Copyright © 2009 EBSCO Publishing. All rights reserved.
DynaMed® is a registered trademark of and published by DynaMed LLC. Original date of on-line publication December 15, 1995 with continuous daily updating. ISSN: 1554-1177. Subscriptions and queries can be addressed to DynaMed LLC, EBSCO Publishing, 10 Estes St., Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA 01938-0602, telephone (978) 356-6500, facsimile (978) 356-6565, e-mail Editor@DynamicMedical.com. The opinions expressed herein are solely those of the authors and editors and may or may not represent the official position of cooperating or endorsing Medical Societies. Development of DynaMed was supported in part by the National Science Foundation through a Small Business Innovative Research grant. (All other support comes from subscriptions. No advertisements are accepted.)
RSS Feed