Use of aspirin for patients with heart failure is controversial. Previously, the Warfarin/Aspirin Study in Heart Failure (WASH) trial found increased hospitalization for heart failure in patients taking aspirin compared to patients taking either warfarin or placebo. The newly published Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure (WATCH) trial compared the relative efficacy of warfarin, clopidogrel and aspirin in 1,587 patients with heart failure followed for mean 1.9 years. Warfarin was administered open-label, but clopidogrel and aspirin groups were double-blinded. While there was no difference in the primary composite outcome of death from all causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke, the trial did support the WASH trial findings regarding the increase in hospitalization for heart failure with the use of aspirin (level 2 [mid-level] evidence). Hospitalization for heart failure was significantly higher for the aspirin group compared to warfarin (22.2% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.02, NNH 17). Incidence of non-fatal stroke was lower for warfarin (0.2%) than both aspirin (1.7%, p = 0.0095 vs. warfarin, NNH 66) and clopidogrel (2.1%, p = 0.0031 vs. warfarin, NNH 52). Mortality was about 18% overall with no differences between groups. There were no differences in bleeding outcomes between warfarin and aspirin (Circulation 2009 Mar 31;119(12):1616). For more information, see the Heart Failure and Aspirin use in patients with heart failure topics in DynaMed.