Rapid Influenza Diagnostic Tests Appear to Have Low Overall Sensitivity for Detecting Pandemic (H1N1) 2009
Three rapid influenza tests appear to have low overall sensitivity for detection of pandemic (H1N1) 2009. Sixty-five respiratory specimens, which previously tested positive for pandemic (H1N1) 2009, were tested again with three rapid influenza diagnostic tests. Detection of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 ranged from 40%-69% overall. Higher sensitivity was reported for seasonal flu (60%-83%), but the evidence is limited due to a small sample size (MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009 Aug 7;58(30):826 full-text).
According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Interim Guidance for the Detection of Novel Influenza A Virus using Rapid Influenza Diagnostic Tests (CDC 2009 Aug 10), the rapid tests may be helpful to guide clinical decisions at the point of care. If influenza virus is active in the community, a positive test suggests presence of that viral infection. Some tests can distinguish between influenza A and B, but rapid influenza diagnostic tests cannot distinguish between seasonal influenza and pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009. A negative test does NOT rule out influenza and should not be used to guide clinical decisions. If clinical suspicion is high, appropriate empiric therapy should be started. Confirmatory tests should also be ordered if appropriate. The CDC also warns clinicians to NOT use a negative test to send a child back to school, rule out an institutional outbreak, or decide infection control measures.
For more information, see the Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 topic in DynaMed.
For the latest evidence-based influenza-related information available for free, visit www.ebscohost.com/flu.
|